Asana vs GitHub Projects: which one fits your team?
This is the engineering tool against the company tool, and it is usually settled by who is paying. Engineers want the tracker, operations wants the platform, and the company ends up with both.
It turns on whether the non engineers need to see the work, and how much that visibility is worth in seats.
Pick Asana if
your company runs many teams and somebody above them needs the view from above. Where it stops: it tracks status, it does not lay out your hours.
Pick GitHub Projects if
every piece of work is an issue, it never leaves the repo, and everybody has a GitHub login. Where it stops: no calendar, and it assumes everyone is on GitHub.
What it costs
For a team of 5, billed yearly: Asana is about $659.40 a year, GitHub Projects does not publish a per seat price we can put in this sum, and UnaTask is €480 plus VAT.
Asana: Free up to 2 users. $10.99 Starter and $24.99 Advanced per user per month billed annually. GitHub Projects: Included with GitHub. There is no separate charge for Projects.
Where they part company
Asana does more on 8 of them
- turning email and chat into tasks
- having a plan for today
- two way calendar sync
- dependencies and a timeline
- showing who has room
- turning meetings into tasks
- portfolio and agile reporting
- rules that fire on their own
GitHub Projects does more on 2 of them
- linking pull requests to the work
- being useful before you configure it
Side by side
| What it does | Asana | GitHub Projects | UnaTask |
|---|---|---|---|
| Time blocking on a calendar | No | No | Core |
| A plan for today and this week | Partly. A My Tasks list sorted by due date, not a day against real hours. | No | Core |
| Two way calendar sync | Partly. A calendar view of due dates, and one way feeds out. | No | Yes |
| It is the task manager itself | Core | Core | Core |
| Dependencies and a timeline | Yes | Partly | Yes. Dependencies with a timeline that shows what is waiting on what. |
| See who has room | Yes | Partly | Core |
| Booking links | No | No | Yes |
| Meetings become tasks | Partly | No | Yes |
| Email and chat become tasks | Yes | No | Yes |
| Pull requests linked to work | Partly | Core. Issues and pull requests are the items. Nothing to link. | Yes |
| Docs and wiki inside | Partly | Partly. The repo wiki and markdown in the repo, not a workspace. | Partly. Docs live on a project, they are not a wiki you would run a company from. |
| Portfolio or agile reporting | Core. Portfolios and goals that roll up, which is the reason people buy it. | Yes | Partly. Team workload and project progress, not portfolios that roll up to a board. |
| Rules that fire on their own | Core | Yes | Yes |
| AI that does the work, not just the scheduling | Partly | Partly | Yes. AI teammates you assign a task to. The work comes back on the task for review. |
| Useful before you configure it | Partly | Yes | Core |
| A free plan | Yes | Yes | Yes |
What should not decide it
They answer the same on 6: time blocking on a calendar, being the place the tasks actually live, booking links, docs and a wiki inside, AI that does the work rather than the scheduling and having a free plan.
And where UnaTask sits
UnaTask is the layer that includes everyone without asking engineering to move: it links your pull requests and welcomes the people who have never opened a repo.
It does more than both of them on time blocking on a calendar, having a plan for today, two way calendar sync, showing who has room, booking links, turning meetings into tasks, AI that does the work rather than the scheduling and being useful before you configure it.
Common questions
Asana vs GitHub Projects: which should I pick?
Pick Asana if your company runs many teams and somebody above them needs the view from above. Pick GitHub Projects if every piece of work is an issue, it never leaves the repo, and everybody has a GitHub login.
What is the biggest difference between Asana and GitHub Projects?
The clearest gap is turning email and chat into tasks, where Asana does more than GitHub Projects. Underneath that, Asana is a configurable platform several departments can shape to their own process, and GitHub Projects is a system of record for software work, built around issues and cycles.
Is Asana or GitHub Projects cheaper?
For a team of 5, billed yearly: Asana is about $659.40 a year, GitHub Projects does not publish a per seat price we can put in this sum, and UnaTask is €480 plus VAT.
What do Asana and GitHub Projects have in common?
They answer the same on 6 of our 16 axes, among them time blocking on a calendar, being the place the tasks actually live and booking links. Those are the things that should not decide it for you.
Where does UnaTask fit against Asana and GitHub Projects?
UnaTask does more than both on time blocking on a calendar, having a plan for today and two way calendar sync. It is free on your own and €10 per seat for a team, with every feature included. Where it does less: it is not an issue tracker with sprints and burndown, and it is not a documentation workspace.
Details checked 2 August 2026 and June 2026.