Linear vs Zenhub: which one fits your team?
Both of these are systems of record for shipping software, and both are good at it. The choice is usually about how much process you want enforced and where the issues already live.
It turns on how heavy a workflow your team will tolerate, and whether everything already lives in GitHub.
Pick Linear if
you ship software and you want the sharpest place there is to track issues and cycles. Where it stops: there is no calendar, so it never says when the work happens.
Pick Zenhub if
your team runs agile entirely on GitHub Issues and wants the reporting to match. Where it stops: it is engineering shaped, and there is no calendar.
What it costs
For a team of 5, billed yearly: Linear is about $480 a year, Zenhub does not publish a per seat price we can put in this sum, and UnaTask is €480 plus VAT.
Linear: Free tier, then around $8 to $14 per seat per month. Zenhub: Paid per user, with a free tier for small teams. Check their current tiers.
Where they part company
Linear does more on 5 of them
- being the place the tasks actually live
- having a plan for today
- docs and a wiki inside
- AI that does the work rather than the scheduling
- being useful before you configure it
Zenhub does more on 1 of them
- portfolio and agile reporting
Side by side
| What it does | Linear | Zenhub | UnaTask |
|---|---|---|---|
| Time blocking on a calendar | No | No | Core |
| A plan for today and this week | Partly. Cycles and lists, not a day laid out against hours. | No | Core |
| Two way calendar sync | No | No | Yes |
| It is the task manager itself | Core | Partly. The issues live in GitHub. Zenhub is the layer that runs agile on them. | Core |
| Dependencies and a timeline | Yes | Yes | Yes. Dependencies with a timeline that shows what is waiting on what. |
| See who has room | Yes | Yes | Core |
| Booking links | No | No | Yes |
| Meetings become tasks | No | No | Yes |
| Email and chat become tasks | Partly | Partly | Yes |
| Pull requests linked to work | Core. Strong native pull request linking, with status driven from branches. | Core | Yes |
| Docs and wiki inside | Partly | No | Partly. Docs live on a project, they are not a wiki you would run a company from. |
| Portfolio or agile reporting | Yes | Core. Burndown, velocity and story points, which is the reason to buy it. | Partly. Team workload and project progress, not portfolios that roll up to a board. |
| Rules that fire on their own | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| AI that does the work, not just the scheduling | Partly | No | Yes. AI teammates you assign a task to. The work comes back on the task for review. |
| Useful before you configure it | Yes | Partly | Core |
| A free plan | Yes | Yes | Yes |
What should not decide it
They answer the same on 10: time blocking on a calendar, two way calendar sync, dependencies and a timeline, showing who has room, booking links, turning meetings into tasks, turning email and chat into tasks, linking pull requests to the work, rules that fire on their own and having a free plan.
And where UnaTask sits
UnaTask is not competing for this slot. It is the calendar around it: link the pull request to the task, block the hours for the review, include the people without a GitHub login.
It does more than both of them on time blocking on a calendar, having a plan for today, two way calendar sync, showing who has room, booking links, turning meetings into tasks, turning email and chat into tasks, AI that does the work rather than the scheduling and being useful before you configure it.
Common questions
Linear vs Zenhub: which should I pick?
Pick Linear if you ship software and you want the sharpest place there is to track issues and cycles. Pick Zenhub if your team runs agile entirely on GitHub Issues and wants the reporting to match.
What is the biggest difference between Linear and Zenhub?
The clearest gap is being the place the tasks actually live, where Linear does more than Zenhub. Underneath that, Linear is a system of record for software work, built around issues and cycles, and Zenhub is a system of record for software work, built around issues and cycles.
Is Linear or Zenhub cheaper?
For a team of 5, billed yearly: Linear is about $480 a year, Zenhub does not publish a per seat price we can put in this sum, and UnaTask is €480 plus VAT.
What do Linear and Zenhub have in common?
They answer the same on 10 of our 16 axes, among them time blocking on a calendar, two way calendar sync and dependencies and a timeline. Those are the things that should not decide it for you.
Where does UnaTask fit against Linear and Zenhub?
UnaTask does more than both on time blocking on a calendar, having a plan for today and two way calendar sync. It is free on your own and €10 per seat for a team, with every feature included. Where it does less: it is not an issue tracker with sprints and burndown, and it is not a documentation workspace.
Details checked June 2026.