GitHub Projects vs Todoist: which one fits your team?
Same idea, two weights. One is understood in four seconds by anybody; the other enforces a workflow and produces the reports. The step between them is usually a growth event, not a preference.
It turns on how much process your team needs enforced, and how much of it people will actually follow.
Pick GitHub Projects if
every piece of work is an issue, it never leaves the repo, and everybody has a GitHub login. Where it stops: no calendar, and it assumes everyone is on GitHub.
Pick Todoist if
you want the quickest personal list in existence and you mostly work alone. Where it stops: a list is not a plan, and there is no time blocking.
What it costs
For a team of 5, billed yearly: GitHub Projects does not publish a per seat price we can put in this sum, Todoist is about $480 a year, and UnaTask is €480 plus VAT.
GitHub Projects: Included with GitHub. There is no separate charge for Projects. Todoist: Generous free tier. Pro around $5, Business around $8 per user per month.
Where they part company
GitHub Projects does more on 6 of them
- linking pull requests to the work
- dependencies and a timeline
- docs and a wiki inside
- portfolio and agile reporting
- rules that fire on their own
- AI that does the work rather than the scheduling
Todoist does more on 4 of them
- turning email and chat into tasks
- having a plan for today
- two way calendar sync
- being useful before you configure it
Side by side
| What it does | GitHub Projects | Todoist | UnaTask |
|---|---|---|---|
| Time blocking on a calendar | No | No | Core |
| A plan for today and this week | No | Partly. A today list, ordered by due date, not a day laid out against hours. | Core |
| Two way calendar sync | No | Partly. A calendar view and limited sync, not a calendar you plan on. | Yes |
| It is the task manager itself | Core | Core | Core |
| Dependencies and a timeline | Partly | No | Yes. Dependencies with a timeline that shows what is waiting on what. |
| See who has room | Partly | Partly | Core |
| Booking links | No | No | Yes |
| Meetings become tasks | No | No | Yes |
| Email and chat become tasks | No | Yes | Yes |
| Pull requests linked to work | Core. Issues and pull requests are the items. Nothing to link. | No | Yes |
| Docs and wiki inside | Partly. The repo wiki and markdown in the repo, not a workspace. | No | Partly. Docs live on a project, they are not a wiki you would run a company from. |
| Portfolio or agile reporting | Yes | Partly | Partly. Team workload and project progress, not portfolios that roll up to a board. |
| Rules that fire on their own | Yes | Partly | Yes |
| AI that does the work, not just the scheduling | Partly | No | Yes. AI teammates you assign a task to. The work comes back on the task for review. |
| Useful before you configure it | Yes | Core | Core |
| A free plan | Yes | Yes | Yes |
What should not decide it
They answer the same on 6: time blocking on a calendar, being the place the tasks actually live, showing who has room, booking links, turning meetings into tasks and having a free plan.
And where UnaTask sits
UnaTask is a third direction rather than a point on that line: keep the surface small, and add the calendar neither of them has.
It does more than both of them on time blocking on a calendar, having a plan for today, two way calendar sync, dependencies and a timeline, showing who has room, booking links, turning meetings into tasks and AI that does the work rather than the scheduling.
Common questions
GitHub Projects vs Todoist: which should I pick?
Pick GitHub Projects if every piece of work is an issue, it never leaves the repo, and everybody has a GitHub login. Pick Todoist if you want the quickest personal list in existence and you mostly work alone.
What is the biggest difference between GitHub Projects and Todoist?
The clearest gap is linking pull requests to the work, where GitHub Projects does more than Todoist. Underneath that, GitHub Projects is a system of record for software work, built around issues and cycles, and Todoist is a list or a board that everybody understands without being taught.
Is GitHub Projects or Todoist cheaper?
For a team of 5, billed yearly: GitHub Projects does not publish a per seat price we can put in this sum, Todoist is about $480 a year, and UnaTask is €480 plus VAT.
What do GitHub Projects and Todoist have in common?
They answer the same on 6 of our 16 axes, among them time blocking on a calendar, being the place the tasks actually live and showing who has room. Those are the things that should not decide it for you.
Where does UnaTask fit against GitHub Projects and Todoist?
UnaTask does more than both on time blocking on a calendar, having a plan for today and two way calendar sync. It is free on your own and €10 per seat for a team, with every feature included. Where it does less: it is not an issue tracker with sprints and burndown, and it is not a documentation workspace.
Details checked June 2026.