Wrike vs Zenhub: which one fits your team?
This is the engineering tool against the company tool, and it is usually settled by who is paying. Engineers want the tracker, operations wants the platform, and the company ends up with both.
It turns on whether the non engineers need to see the work, and how much that visibility is worth in seats.
Pick Wrike if
you run an agency or a PMO and you need proofing on creative assets or formal resourcing. Where it stops: it is heavier than most work requires, and it plans in dates.
Pick Zenhub if
your team runs agile entirely on GitHub Issues and wants the reporting to match. Where it stops: it is engineering shaped, and there is no calendar.
What it costs
For a team of 5, billed yearly: Wrike is about $600 a year, Zenhub does not publish a per seat price we can put in this sum, and UnaTask is €480 plus VAT.
Wrike: Free plan. $10 Team and $25 Business per user per month. Zenhub: Paid per user, with a free tier for small teams. Check their current tiers.
Where they part company
Wrike does more on 9 of them
- being the place the tasks actually live
- having a plan for today
- two way calendar sync
- showing who has room
- turning meetings into tasks
- turning email and chat into tasks
- docs and a wiki inside
- rules that fire on their own
- AI that does the work rather than the scheduling
Zenhub does more on 2 of them
- linking pull requests to the work
- being useful before you configure it
Side by side
| What it does | Wrike | Zenhub | UnaTask |
|---|---|---|---|
| Time blocking on a calendar | No | No | Core |
| A plan for today and this week | Partly | No | Core |
| Two way calendar sync | Partly | No | Yes |
| It is the task manager itself | Core | Partly. The issues live in GitHub. Zenhub is the layer that runs agile on them. | Core |
| Dependencies and a timeline | Yes | Yes | Yes. Dependencies with a timeline that shows what is waiting on what. |
| See who has room | Core. Formal resource management with time tracking, which is more than we do. | Yes | Core |
| Booking links | No | No | Yes |
| Meetings become tasks | Partly | No | Yes |
| Email and chat become tasks | Yes | Partly | Yes |
| Pull requests linked to work | Partly | Core | Yes |
| Docs and wiki inside | Partly | No | Partly. Docs live on a project, they are not a wiki you would run a company from. |
| Portfolio or agile reporting | Core | Core. Burndown, velocity and story points, which is the reason to buy it. | Partly. Team workload and project progress, not portfolios that roll up to a board. |
| Rules that fire on their own | Core | Yes | Yes |
| AI that does the work, not just the scheduling | Partly | No | Yes. AI teammates you assign a task to. The work comes back on the task for review. |
| Useful before you configure it | No. Intake, approvals and resourcing are worth configuring and take configuring. | Partly | Core |
| A free plan | Yes | Yes | Yes |
What should not decide it
They answer the same on 5: time blocking on a calendar, dependencies and a timeline, booking links, portfolio and agile reporting and having a free plan.
And where UnaTask sits
UnaTask is the layer that includes everyone without asking engineering to move: it links your pull requests and welcomes the people who have never opened a repo.
It does more than both of them on time blocking on a calendar, having a plan for today, two way calendar sync, booking links, turning meetings into tasks, AI that does the work rather than the scheduling and being useful before you configure it.
Common questions
Wrike vs Zenhub: which should I pick?
Pick Wrike if you run an agency or a PMO and you need proofing on creative assets or formal resourcing. Pick Zenhub if your team runs agile entirely on GitHub Issues and wants the reporting to match.
What is the biggest difference between Wrike and Zenhub?
The clearest gap is being the place the tasks actually live, where Wrike does more than Zenhub. Underneath that, Wrike is a configurable platform several departments can shape to their own process, and Zenhub is a system of record for software work, built around issues and cycles.
Is Wrike or Zenhub cheaper?
For a team of 5, billed yearly: Wrike is about $600 a year, Zenhub does not publish a per seat price we can put in this sum, and UnaTask is €480 plus VAT.
What do Wrike and Zenhub have in common?
They answer the same on 5 of our 16 axes, among them time blocking on a calendar, dependencies and a timeline and booking links. Those are the things that should not decide it for you.
Where does UnaTask fit against Wrike and Zenhub?
UnaTask does more than both on time blocking on a calendar, having a plan for today and two way calendar sync. It is free on your own and €10 per seat for a team, with every feature included. Where it does less: it is not an issue tracker with sprints and burndown, and it is not a documentation workspace.
Details checked 2 August 2026 and June 2026.