Trello vs Wrike: which one fits your team?
One is loved because it never makes anybody feel stupid. The other is bought because somebody needs a dashboard. Teams migrate from the first to the second and quietly miss the first.
It turns on whether the reporting is worth the weight, which depends entirely on who is asking for it.
Pick Trello if
you want a board everyone gets instantly, for free, and tracking state is all you need. Where it stops: a board says what state something is in, never when it happens.
Pick Wrike if
you run an agency or a PMO and you need proofing on creative assets or formal resourcing. Where it stops: it is heavier than most work requires, and it plans in dates.
What it costs
For a team of 5, billed yearly: Trello is about $300 a year, Wrike is about $600 a year, and UnaTask is €480 plus VAT. Between the two of them Trello is $300 a year cheaper at that size.
Trello: Free up to 10 collaborators. $5 Standard and $10 Premium per user per month billed annually. Wrike: Free plan. $10 Team and $25 Business per user per month.
Where they part company
Wrike does more on 9 of them
- dependencies and a timeline
- showing who has room
- portfolio and agile reporting
- having a plan for today
- turning meetings into tasks
- turning email and chat into tasks
- docs and a wiki inside
- rules that fire on their own
- AI that does the work rather than the scheduling
Trello does more on 1 of them
- being useful before you configure it
Side by side
| What it does | Trello | Wrike | UnaTask |
|---|---|---|---|
| Time blocking on a calendar | No | No | Core |
| A plan for today and this week | No | Partly | Core |
| Two way calendar sync | Partly. A calendar power up on the board, not a calendar you plan a week on. | Partly | Yes |
| It is the task manager itself | Core | Core | Core |
| Dependencies and a timeline | No | Yes | Yes. Dependencies with a timeline that shows what is waiting on what. |
| See who has room | Partly | Core. Formal resource management with time tracking, which is more than we do. | Core |
| Booking links | No | No | Yes |
| Meetings become tasks | No | Partly | Yes |
| Email and chat become tasks | Partly | Yes | Yes |
| Pull requests linked to work | Partly. Through a power up rather than natively. | Partly | Yes |
| Docs and wiki inside | No | Partly | Partly. Docs live on a project, they are not a wiki you would run a company from. |
| Portfolio or agile reporting | Partly | Core | Partly. Team workload and project progress, not portfolios that roll up to a board. |
| Rules that fire on their own | Yes. Butler rules on the board are genuinely good and free to start. | Core | Yes |
| AI that does the work, not just the scheduling | No | Partly | Yes. AI teammates you assign a task to. The work comes back on the task for review. |
| Useful before you configure it | Core | No. Intake, approvals and resourcing are worth configuring and take configuring. | Core |
| A free plan | Yes | Yes | Yes |
What should not decide it
They answer the same on 6: time blocking on a calendar, two way calendar sync, being the place the tasks actually live, booking links, linking pull requests to the work and having a free plan.
And where UnaTask sits
UnaTask keeps the small surface and answers the question the board never could: not what state is it in, but when is it happening.
It does more than both of them on time blocking on a calendar, having a plan for today, two way calendar sync, booking links, turning meetings into tasks, linking pull requests to the work and AI that does the work rather than the scheduling.
Common questions
Trello vs Wrike: which should I pick?
Pick Trello if you want a board everyone gets instantly, for free, and tracking state is all you need. Pick Wrike if you run an agency or a PMO and you need proofing on creative assets or formal resourcing.
What is the biggest difference between Trello and Wrike?
The clearest gap is being useful before you configure it, where Trello does more than Wrike. Underneath that, Trello is a list or a board that everybody understands without being taught, and Wrike is a configurable platform several departments can shape to their own process.
Is Trello or Wrike cheaper?
For a team of 5, billed yearly: Trello is about $300 a year, Wrike is about $600 a year, and UnaTask is €480 plus VAT. Between the two of them Trello is $300 a year cheaper at that size.
What do Trello and Wrike have in common?
They answer the same on 6 of our 16 axes, among them time blocking on a calendar, two way calendar sync and being the place the tasks actually live. Those are the things that should not decide it for you.
Where does UnaTask fit against Trello and Wrike?
UnaTask does more than both on time blocking on a calendar, having a plan for today and two way calendar sync. It is free on your own and €10 per seat for a team, with every feature included. Where it does less: it is not an issue tracker with sprints and burndown, and it is not a documentation workspace.
Details checked 2 August 2026.